CHUMBLEYMANIA   Leave a comment


(With “Galaxy 4”, we reach Part 18 of our Name Dropping journey through the First Doctor’s character arc as represented by his changing ways of addressing Steven: in which we fid that there’s still some turkey left over from Christmas.)

Having sat through this turkey, one of the few things I can find the energy to say about “Galaxy 4” is that sometimes the junkers in the BBC archives showed some good taste in their choices and that Terry Burnett should have kept it quiet that he he held episode 3 rather than returning it to the BBC in 2011.

How could anyone ever have supposed that the Chumblies could be another Daleks success? Chumbleymania?

However, there’s still the matter of what the Doctor calls Steven in this story: my boy x 4, my dear young man x 1, dear boy x 4, young man x 5 and my dear boy x 1.

(select NAME DROPPING from the list of Categories in the left hand menu to catch the rest of this series)


Posted March 30, 2016 by docwhom in Name Dropping

DIDDLY DUM PODCAST 054 – Conventionality Belongs to Yesterday   Leave a comment


Paul Winter, the Co-ordinator of the Doctor Who Appreciation Society, joins the Four Faces of Delusion to talk about conventions and whether the days of the fan convention are numbered. We cover first conventions, their increasing cost, the most bizarre rules on autographs and selfies, and buying Nick Courtney drinks.

Matt talks of the magic of meeting Peter Capaldi. Hayden regales us with tales of the day he consoled a despondent Sylvester McCoy on his shoulder and Terrance Dicks bought him a cider. Meanwhile Doc relates the day he wet himself at the Blackpool Doctor Who Exhibition.

Along the way, we pay a special Doctor Who themed tribute to the late Sylvia Anderson, Matt reports on his recent trip to Sheffield for The Valiant 2016 convention, and Hayden reports on his recent trip to Cardiff’s Doctor Who Experience to take the TARDIS Set Tour.

But foremost among this week’s experiences is a message from Peter Capaldi to the Diddly Dumbers and their faithless listeners.


Listen or download MP3 directly from the podcast blog and see Shownotes

Listen/download on iTunes


Find us on Facebook

We can also be found on the Doctor Who Podcast Alliance

Find Diddly Dum pics on Tumblr.

Visit our new Youtube page.


Email us at


Posted March 30, 2016 by docwhom in Podcast

DIDDLY DUM PODCAST 053 – Doc’s Comedy Hour   Leave a comment


In this, the second of his occasional series of laser-guided rib-ticklers, Hayden talks to fellow member of the Four Faces of Delusion, Doc, about his tastes in comedy and illustrates these with some toothsome clips.

From The Goon Show through to Frasier via the many radio and TV byways of his life, Doc opens his soul to the faithless listener. Accordingly, you’re advised to have garlic and holy water to hand.

Listen or download MP3 directly from the podcast blog and see Shownotes

Listen/download on iTunes


Find us on Facebook

We can also be found on the Doctor Who Podcast Alliance

Find Diddly Dum pics on Tumbler.

Visit our new Youtube page.


Email us at



Posted March 30, 2016 by docwhom in Podcast, Uncategorized

DOC WHOM IN THE LAND OF OZ   Leave a comment


“Doc Whom is Required” – a revelation which will come as a shock to regular readers of this blog. Nevertheless, it’s the title of Episode 52 of the Forty-Two to Doomsday Podcast – “Doc Whom is Required” is now online and features as a guest that venerable blogger, podcaster and all round scapegrace, Doc Whom…oh hang on, that’s me…courtesy of Rob and Mark, the owners of the third and fourth most convincing Australian accents in podcasting.

We compare Australian and British accents, our differing TV landscapes and puzzle over the conundrum that is the unusual distribution of Doctor Who podcasts worldwide. We reveal the true reason why the British built an Empire, then strap yourselves in as we turn to why fans should say whatever they really think about Doctor Who.

42TD’s podcast blog can be found here.

Their Facebook page can be found here.

Their Twitter account can be found here.




Posted March 11, 2016 by docwhom in Doctor Who, Misc


steven taylor

(With “The Time Meddler”, we reach Part 17 of our Name Dropping journey through the First Doctor’s character arc as it moves seamlessly from analysis of his changing ways of addressing Ian to that of addressing Steven Taylor: in which we rage at the BBC’s junking policy and speculate on what sort of companions other Blue Peter presenters might have made.)

In “The Time Meddler” we have a regrettably rare complete Steven story. Of the 25 episodes between this and the next complete story, only 4 are extant in the BBC’s archives. This is the worst thing about “The Time Meddler”. It’s the gleaming shop window behind which are displayed the prospect of goodies, while we are the poor street urchins with our noses pressed to that window, knowing that we’ll be denied an opportunity to feast on them. We may have “The Arc” and “The Gunfighters” waiting complete for us on the other side of the abyss but by then we’ll be into the era of Dodo (nowhere near as extinct as her name suggests and her character deserves). By then, the great days will be behind us because not only does Peter Purves’s first full story hold the promise that Steven is going to be a truly belting companion, his rapport with Vicky hits the ground running and they play off each other splendidly. They have a much more vibrant and equal relationship than Susan had with her companions who never entirely lost the teacher-pupil relationship. Had the Doctor, Ian or Barbara suggested going to a monastery, Susan’s reaction would most likely have been to complain that it was scary or that she had a headache. Vicky will quite readily argue that they should go to the beach instead. This isn’t her being argumentative but just having an opinion and standing up for it. I hope this continues in what little time Vicky and Steven have left together.

Because, thanks to the criminal lunacy of the BBC’s policy of junking tapes (their choice of tapes to junk is almost more painful than the policy itself), this story is our only chance to see these two together.

For those of my generation, who missed Peter Purves’s time on Doctor Who but experienced him as the sensible one on Blue Peter who we’d never seen acting, it’s initially difficult to take Steven entirely on face value. That face and that voice are so inescapably wedded to the world of “here’s one I made earlier” that at first you expect that you’re going to have to sit through a season concentrating hard in an attempt to pretend that a Blue Peter presenter isn’t travelling in the TARDIS. But before you know it, the world of milk bottle tops and toilet roll inners have vanished and he’s 100% Steven Taylor.

Which leads us to imagine what might have been had fate landed us with another Blue Peter presenter as the new companion. Just imagine John Noakes joining the TARDIS crew. I suspect he’d have been the Mickey of the 1960s, the comic relief foil for the Doctor. John’s Blue Peter adventures up Nelson’s Column and on the Cresta Run suggest that he’d be brave enough to be the action man figure but I’m not sure how Mary Whitehouse would have reacted to him flaunting his buttock bruises on Doctor Who. As for the other candidate, Valerie Singleton, she always came across as a sort of Verity Lambert with less vinegar so maybe she’d have been better suited to the production office.

No, I think Peter Purves was the man for the job. Where the villager Eldred (Must Live?) says that he doesn’t trust our heroes, Steven replies “Well, I’m not mad about you either!” Had this been Ian’s line, he would probably have delivered it under his breath or once the other guy had moved away. Not out of cowardice of course but because Ian was the quintessence of cool unflappability. Steven, however, gets right in Eldred’s face to say it. Yes, I think we’ll be seeing great things from Mr Taylor. Or rather hearing great things.

Knowing someone for something else can’t always be overcome. As good as the monk is, I was never able to get the Peter Butterworth of the Carry On films out of my mind. I realise that we’re yet to get a glimpse of Time Lord society but, when you’re irretrievably associated with lines like “Dan Dan, the lavatory man”, then robed and statuesque majesty burning at the centre of Time rather goes out of the window.

“The Time Meddler” is certainly a milestone but not a game changer. Time Lords are still a thing of the future and won’t even be encountered again until the end of the Second Doctor’s era. But it’s still a shock to hear a supposedly medieval monk say, on seeing the TARDIS materialise: “I wonder”. It’s a pity that the main impression of the Doctor’s race we’re left with is that they must be compulsive gigglers but never mind that. The idea is worth it for the reveal of the Monk’s TARDIS. As far as jaw-dropping cliffhangers go, that has to be up there with the Dalek emerging from the Thames in “The Dalek Invasion of Earth” and young River Song beginning to regenerate at the end of “Day of the Moon”. I think that I’ll keep a note of belting cliffhangers as I blog my through the run of Doctor Who and collect them in order of wowness at the end. If it’s made me drop my delicate crystal glass of dry sherry in an age when we’ve seen umpteen Time Lords wandering around in their own TARDISes, imagine how it must have appeared to kids at the time when there was still a general notion that the TARDIS was a machine that the Doctor had built himself.

A few final points. As silly as it is, “A space helmet for a cow?” is a genuinely laugh out loud line. And we get the first example of faces appearing in the credits, albeit the closing ones

Now for our new record of how the First Doctor addresses Steven. Let’s see if it differs much from Ian’s treatment. Steven gets: dear boy x 2, my dear boy x 1, my boy x 1, young man x 4 and even a Mr Taylor x 1. If Ian wanted a “Mr Chesterton”, he had to turn to Susan.

(select NAME DROPPING from the list of Categories in the left hand menu to catch the rest of this series)

Posted March 9, 2016 by docwhom in Name Dropping

THE END OF THE BEGINNING   Leave a comment


We’ve finally come to the end of our epic trek through the First Doctor’s character arc (or have we?) as represented by his changing ways of addressing Ian. What have we discovered?

The first thing the Doctor called Ian way back in the Totters Lane junkyard was “young man”. The last thing he called him at the end of “The Chase” was “my dear boy (I could kiss you)”. Along the way, in speaking to our action-teacher hero, the Doctor has used 26 different modes of address. At the top of the list, we have 59 instances of “my boy”, beating “Chesterton” into second place with 51. At the end of “Web of Fear”, these two were level pegging on 45 each and it’s only in the last three stories that the rather old fashioned use of just the surname lost ground. Perhaps the most significant change occurs around the time of “The Sensorites” where the use of two or three-word variations of “my dear boy” really seems to take off.

However, what allowances should we make for the First Doctor’s notorious habit of getting his lines wrong? Because there are a further 8 examples of him getting Ian’s surname wrong. From “Chesterfield” to “Charterhouse” via “Chesterman, Charlton, Twester and Che’er”. Surely it ought not to matter whether this represents William Hartnell fluffing his lines or the writers deliberately writing in the wrong surname as part of the Doctor’s absent minded old man characterisation. Even when in “The Romans” the Doctor calls him Chesterfield quite clearly as a deliberate joke, all of these are examples of an intention to call Ian by his surname alone. As a result, “Chesterton” and “my boy” end up tying for first place with 59 each. I omit from these the Doctor’s single use of “Mr Chesterton” in “Edge of Destruction” as there’s clearly a world of difference between “Mr Chesterton” and simply “Chesterton”.

We have to take into account that the use of the simple surname “Chesterton” can mean different things. It can be an expression of authority and distance on the Doctor’s part or simply what an Edwardian gentleman would in fact call a close friend (remember the chummy uses of “Higgins” and “Pickering” in “My Fair Lady”).

A late rush of 14 separate instances in “The Chase” alone pushed “dear boy” into third place with 49 while “my dear boy” languishes in fifth place with 32.

When I started out on this journey, I vaguely imagined that we would see the thawing relationship between the two men mirrored by a gradual change from “Chesterton” to “Ian”. But what’s perhaps extraordinary is that, out of 241 different instances we’ve taken into account over the course of 16 stories, the Doctor calls Ian by his Christian name on a mere 4 occasions. And 1 of those occurs when he’s wandering through the caves in “Marco Polo” trying to find Ian and joining in with Susan calling out “Ian”. Presumably it wouldn’t have helped if they’d been calling out different things.

The very best that Ian gets occurs in “The Crusade” when the Doctor once calls him “Sir Ian”.

What then can we deduce about the Doctor’s character arc as represented by his different modes of address for Ian? Not much, it turns out. However, not to be disheartened, I was sufficiently intrigued by the Doctor’s use of several variants when talking to Steven on Mechanus to continue this trek and see whether we find any indication that Steven gets a better deal than Ian did. Hopefully, by the end of “The Massacre”, I’ll have thought up an excuse to carry it on into Sailor Ben’s time in the TARDIS. It’d be a shame to end my first ever complete run (in order) of “Doctor Who” purely out of the absence of any clear motivation.

Onward! In “The Chase”, the Doctor calls Steven: young man x 1, dear boy x 1, Steven Taylor x 1.

Ian List

Posted March 8, 2016 by docwhom in Name Dropping



(With “The Chase”, we reach Part 16 and the thrilling climax of our Name Dropping journey through the First Doctor’s character arc as represented by his changing ways of addressing Ian: in which we wave a tearful goodbye to Ian and Barbara and speculate on what sort of companions other Blue Peter presenters might have made.)

Surprisingly for a show of its time, Doctor Who seems so far to have avoided the trap of making futuristic machinery and equipment the size of a house and thus instantly dated. Then along comes the Time Space Visualiser whose main claim to fame is that it was the original cross-sectional design model for the Large Hadron Collider at Cern.


Why oh why did we have to wait until the eleventh minute of the eleventh hour to see Ian dressed gloriously as an Everton mint. Perhaps this blog series missed a trick in not analysing his character arc through his clothes. Mind you, “suit, cardie, suit, cardy, suit, cardy, Doonican, stripey” would have told us little, I suspect. What a prescient coup to get footage of The Beatles. Even Ian can’t get their music out of his feet as he shimmies across the TARDIS floor throwing the now famous twisty-ear-cupping shapes which took over the world’s dancefloors.


Of the plot of “The Chase”, the less said the better. Even the Daleks are treated as comic relief here, grunting and erring their way through Time. It’s a testament to the genius of Raymond Cusick that their reputation survived the multiple vehicle pile-up which is the haunted house encounter. Little wonder that Dracula turned up. He must have been attracted by the prospect of a real feast as TV viewers across the land began slashing their wrists in despair. It’s also a testament to the talent of Peter Purves that his reputation survived the Morton Dill scene. Maybe no-one was still watching at that point.

Eventually we reach the only decent part of “The Chase” which is the happenings on Mechanus. The idea of a duplicate Doctor is lovely and I don’t think it deserves its reputation as looking nothing like William Hartnell. The duplicate’s mistake in calling Vicky “Susan” is quite clever but relies on Ian and Barbara being surprised to hear the Doctor getting people’s names mixed up. Imagine if the writer had decided that the duplicate’s identity would be revealed by it accidentally calling Ian “Chesterfield”. Would anyone have even blinked?

We’re introduced to Steven Taylor on Mechanus and surprisingly good he is in spite of the toy panda. His sardonic line “Help yourself to a piece of eternity” is delicious and bodes well for the future. We’ll pass quickly over Vicky briefly reverting to a helpless Susan archetype on the roof of the city as we reach the sad departure of Ian and Barbara. Our kidnapped schoolteachers have been with us from the very beginning and I think have played just as big a role as William Hartnell in ensuring the popularity of Doctor Who.

We get a nice reaction from the Doctor. When he sees Ian emerge from the Dalek time machine doing a Barbara from “Dalek Invasion of Earth” doing a Dalek, he’s overjoyed and sufficiently moved to say “My dear boy, I could kiss you”. I think we can all agree that the Doctor has moved a long way since the “young man” with which he first grumpily addressed Ian as he accused him of having “pushed your way in here uninvited and unwelcome”. When he realises that Ian and Barbara genuinely want to go home, he briefly turns angry and really loses his temper with Ian. All the more convincing for such a sad departure. It’s up there with saying goodbye to Sarah and, in its understatedness, easily beats the schmaltz of Bad Wolf Bay.


Sadly to the final stage of our mission. In their final story, the Doctor addresses Ian as follows: Chesterton x 5, my dear Chesterton x 2, dear boy x 14, my dear boy x 3, my boy x 4, young man x 1, sir x 1. Here we find ourselves in a dilemma. The duplicate Doctor addresses Ian as Chesteron 3 times. Do these count towards our statistics? I think not. Next time, I’ll post the final analysis.

(select NAME DROPPING from the list of Categories in the left hand menu to catch the rest of this series)


Posted March 4, 2016 by docwhom in Name Dropping